President Donald TrumpNominated for conducting the National Institute of Health (NIH) and the Directorate of Food and Medicines (FDA) are part of a group of scientists who have just launched a new research magazine focused on the incentive of scientific discourse and the fight against “door” in medical research in the medical research of the communities.
The Journal of the Academy of Public Health (JAPH) includes an editorial board that consists of several scientists complaining about censorship with censorship during Pandemia Covid-19.
JAPH co-founders include Martin Kulldorff, former Faculty of Medicine Harvard A professor who is the founder at the Academy of Science and Freedom of Hillsdale College, and Dr. Jay Bhattachary, a professor of health policy at Stanford University, who is also a Trump candidate for the next director of NiH. Kullldorff and Bhattachary became known during the pandemic author because of the author of the Veliki Barrington Declaration, which sought to challenge the prevailing concepts of a wider medical community about the COID-19-19 strategies, claiming that they were giving up more damage than good.
Dr. Marty Makary, a surgeon and a public policy researcher at Johns Hopkins University, who is Trump’s candidate for the next FDA director, is also a magazine editorial board.
Stanford, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, left, appears along with Dr. Marty Makary, Johns Hopkins University. (Getty Images/Fox News)
Japh accepts a new approach by posting peers’ reviews of reputable studies from other magazines that do not make their peer reviews publicly available. The effort is aimed at encouraging scientific discourse, Kullldorff said in a work that stated the purpose of creating magazines.
The magazine will also seek to promote an “open approach” by making all his work available to everyone in public without a pay wall, he said, and the editorial leadership of the magazine will allow all scientists in his network to “freely publish all their research results in a timely and effective way , “to prevent any potential” door “.
“Scientific journals They had a huge positive impact on the development of science, but in some ways they now interfere with, not to improve the open scientific discourse, “said Kulddorff.” After reviewing history and current problems with magazines, a new model of academic publication has been proposed – proposed to accept open approach and open strict reviews, rewarding their important work with the fee and the public recognition and allows scientists to publish their research in a timely and effective way without spending valuable time and scientists’ resources. “
Kullldorff, Bhattacharya, Makary and others in running a new magazine complained that their views on Covid-19 pandemic were censored. These were the views that were often contrary to the prevailing ideas published at the time by a wider medical community, which were related to topics such as vaccine efficiency, natural immunity, locking and more.
(Cenzura was a common complaint of medical researchers such as Dr. Jay Bhattachary, Dr. Marty Makary and Dr. Martin Kullldorff, who were among rare scientists who promoted ideas such as a flock of immunity and caused the efficiency of prison and vaccine mandate.)
“Great technology censored [sic] All kinds of science of natural immunity, “Makary said in a testimony of Congress after Pandemi. During testimony, Makary also shared that one of his own studies in Johns Hopkins during a pandemic that promoted the effectiveness of natural immunity, and one scientific journal, which is One scientific journal listed as the third most commonly discussed study in 2022, “Censured”.
“Due to my views on the restrictions of the Covid-19, I was particularly aiming for censorship by all-government officials,” Bhattachary added in his own testimony of the Congress of the same year.
Kullldorff, who also complained about the censorship of his attitudes on the covid-19, claimed that he was asked to leave a medical professor at Harvard at Harvard because he “attached the truth” in opposition to the lock of the Coid-19 and the vaccine of the mandate.
Dr. Martin Kullldorff is a former professor of Harvard School of Medicine. (Getty Images)
“Japh will provide a quality with an open review, but he will not enter into new and important ideas for established Orthodox,” said Andrew Noymer, JAPH’s editor-in-chief for Fox News Digital editor.
“To select one example, in our own sub-elevation of the epidemiology of infectious diseases, in the last few years we have seen too few published scholarships about the origin of the SARS-COV-2, a virus that causes a covid. Academic publication because there is existence today too often deals with the preservation of what we think To know, too often to the detriment of new ideas. “
Click here to get the Fox News app
Bhattacharya and Makary did not want to comment on this article.
