As the 2025 project, which Trump rejected, shapes his health policy | News Donald Trump
Few voters were probably expected that President Donald Trump would reduce billions of dollars in the first weeks of his administration from the main state federal cancer investigation agency.
But reducing funding to the National Health Institutes (NIH) are scheduled in Project 2025“Mandate for the lead,” a conservative management plan for which Trump said he didn’t know anything about his campaign. Now his administration has accepted him.
AND Book to reproduce on 922 pages Composed by Heritage Foundation, a conservative research group in Washington, he says “monopoly nih -ao channeling of research should be broken” and calls to limit payments to universities and their hospitals to “help reduce the subsidies of federal taxpayers of the left -wing rows.”
The universities, which are now planning to face a major reduction in agency grands that cover these directing costs, say that politics will destroy current and future biomedical sciences. Federal judge temporarily stopped a reduction in medical studies 10. February After they attracted legal challenges from medical institutions and 22 countries.
Project 2025. As a prologue
The adoption of many project goals 2025 indicates that Trump’s supporters-Mnoga his associates were veterans of his first term, and some joined his second administration-year quietly laid the foundation to disrupt the national healthcare system. This is contrary to Trump’s insistence on the trace of the campaign, after Democrats of Project 2025 made the powerful line of attacks, that he was unknown in the document.
“I have no idea what the 2025 project is,” Trump said on October 31, 2024. At a rally at Albuquerque in New Mexico – one of many times refused any knowledge of the plan. “I never read it and I never will.”
But since his administration is so carefully carefully the Foundation Foundation, opposition groups, and some national democratic leaders say they are able to act quickly to counteract Trump’s moves in court.
They are now preparing for Trump to work on the recommendations of Project 2025 for some of the largest and most important health programs in the country, including Medicaid and Medicare, and for Federal Health Agency.
“There were a lot of planning on the side of the litigation to dispute executive commands and other early actions of many different organizations,” said Noah Bookbinder, president of citizens for responsibility and ethics in Washington, Watchdog Group. “The 2025 project allowed some preparations.”
The plan, for example, requires state flexibility to impose premiums to some users, work demands and life limitations or time limitations of Medicaid covering for some registered in the program for Americans with low income and disability, which could lead to an increase in the number of small ones after the Administration of BIDEN, exposed to the sponsoring program.
“These proposals do not change directly for Medicaid or benefits provided, but the final effect would be fewer people with health covering,” said Larry Levitt, Executive Vice President of Health Policy in Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF), a non -profit health information organization involving KFF health news. “When you raise obstacles to people who are enrolled in Medicaid, such as premium or documenting a working status, eventually acquired coverage with complexity and ability to pay.”
Congress Republicans are considering a budget plan that could result in hundreds of billions of dollars decrease from Medicaid over 10 years.
The 2025 project called to expand access to health plans that are not in accordance with Affordable Care Act The strongest consumer protection. This can lead to a larger choice and lower monthly premiums for customers, but unconscious consumers can face potentially huge costs from the care pockets that plans will not cover.
The 2025 project also invited to stop Medicaid funds for the planned branches of planned parenting. The organization, an important health care provider for women across the country, receives approximately $ 700 million a year from Medicaid and other government programs, based on its 2022-23 report. Abortion consisted of about 4 percent of the services provided by the organization to patients, the report said.
Steps of administration to rinse words such as “capital” from federal documents, deletion of transgender identifiers and reduce international medical assistance – All part of the project of the project 2025.
Under a Memorandum issued in JanuaryFor example, Trump has returned and expanded the prohibition of federal funds to global organizations providing legal infactments.
Studies have revealed that the ban, known as the “global rule” or “Mexican city policy”, took away millions of dollars from foreign help Groups that did not adhere to. It also had a coolant: In Zambia, one group removed information in a contraception brochure, and in Turkiye, some providers stopped talking to patients about menstrual regulation as a form of family planning.
The 2025 project called on the next president to re -establish the GAG rule, saying that “he should be widely assembled to apply to all side of help.”
Trump also signed an executive command that responded to transgender rights Prohibition of federal means For the care of transition for people under the age of 19. The command he signed He also ordered the Federal Government to recognize only two sexes, male and female, and the term “sex” instead of “gender”.
The project document 2025 requires the deletion of the term “gender identity” from federal rules, regulations and scholarships, and to unwrap the policies and procedures for which its authors say they are used to improve the “radical redefinition of sex”. In addition, he says that the programs of the Department of Health and Human Services should “protect children and bodies”.
“Radical actors within and external governments promote a harmful identity policy that replaces the biological gender to subjective concepts of” gender identity, “the project 2025 writes.
Data disappear
As a result of Trump’s native identity order, say researchers of health care health, centers for the control and prevention of the disease (CDC) downloaded online information About transgender health and removed data on LGBTQ+ Health. Federal judge on February 11 ordered much of the information to be renovated; The administration was fulfilled, but she added notifications to some websites that marked them “extremely incorrect” and claiming that they did not “reflect the biological reality”.
The CDC also delayed the publication of information and findings of bird flu in the weekly report of the Morbication and Mortality of the Agency. In addition, federal workers said they were told to pull papers containing words such as “non -bible” or “transgender”. And some hospitals suspended gender confirmation, such as hormone therapy and puberty blocker for young people.
Proponment groups say orders discriminate and represent the obstacles of medical care, and transgender children and their families have filed a number of court challenges.
Lawyers, advocates and researchers say the implementation of many goals of Health policy Project 2025 is a threat.
“Playbook represents anti-science, anti-subcasions and anti-medical program,” the University of Boston’s researcher in the Jama magazine said last year.
The 2025 BluePrint project sets the objectives to suppress the abortion of drugs, restructuring public health agencies and weaken protection against gender -based discrimination. He would have seniors to enroll according to the default settings in the plans of the advantage of Medicare managed by commercial insurers, basically privatizing the health program for the elderly Americans. And this requires the removal of requests for covering for the plans of the affordable care that people buy without federal subsidies, which, according to insurance experts say, risks to leave people under insured.
“It’s the agenda of Trump’s administration,” said Robert Weissman, co -president of a public citizen, a progressive group of consumer advocacy groups. “It is a minimization of care approaches under the guise of strict work requirements in Medicaid, privatizing Medicare -a rolling of consumer protection and subsidies in the Law on Hard Care.”
The White House did not respond to the message asking for a comment. Conservatives said that the implementation of the project proposal would suppress waste and fraud in federal health programs and free health systems from the clutch of a radical agenda “Awakened”.
“Americans are tired of their government to use them against them,” said Paul Dans, lawyer and former director of Project 2025, in a statement 2024. “The administrative state is at best completely out of contact with the US people and, in the worst case, is armed against them.”
Dans did not return the messages looking for a comment for this article.
The Heritage Foundation sought to separate and project 2025 from Trump’s executive orders and other health initiatives.
“It’s not about our recommendations in the 2025 project. – Something we have been doing for over 40 years. This is about the fact that President Trump has fulfilled his promises to make America more secure, stronger and better than ever before, and he and his team deserve merit, “Ellen Keenan, a spokeswoman for Heritage, said in a statement.
The versions of the document have been produced about every four years since the 1980s and influenced other GOP presidents. Former President Ronald Reagan has adopted about two -thirds of the earlier guide for heritage, says the group.
In some cases, Trump’s administration not only followed Project 2025 proposals, but switched to them.
The document invited the next president to reduce and “deradicated” the US International Development Agency (USAID), an independent federal agency that provides foreign assistance and assistance, including for many international health programs.
The administration is not just scalted backwards USAID. Trump’s advisor Elon Musk boasted on his social media platform, X, that his “Government Efficiency Department” fed the “Woodchipper” agency, physically closing his offices and putting almost all his staff on administrative leave, while completing funds for his programs and expanding undoubtedly.
However, the administration risks leaving public support if it adopts the goals of the project to increase US health and health policy. Nearly 60 percent of voters said they were negatively feeling about the 2025 project in the September NBC News poll.
“The 2025 project has never been a thought exercise; There was always a draft, “said Ally Boguhn, a spokeswoman for reproductive freedom for everyone, a abortion group.” We are only a few weeks in his presidency, and that lays the foundation for even more. “
