24Business

Companies that support Peter affected by a bank wave


More interest rates and smaller consumer consumption presses companies burdened with debt that supports private capital groups, forcing them or restructuring through bankruptcy or to buy time for recovery through out -of -court settlements with creditors.

Stress to companies that support private capital is the most obvious you can see ua recent study S&P Global Market Intelligence, which shows that a record number of 110 private and risky companies supported by capital companies has submitted a bankruptcy request in 2024.

These failures, concentrated in consumer and health sector, show that even while the unemployment rate in the US is still low and S&P 500 is growing more and more, some parts of corporate America suffer because many companies are struggling to survive under high interest pressure pressure rate, smaller consumer consumption and huge debts.

“I think the initial reason why the company is a bankruptcy request when they were the subject of acquisitions by private capital that they had too much debt,” said Lawrence Kotler, a lawyer partner who focused on bankruptcy in Duane Morris. “Everything was used by the end.”

High interest rates took a toll in the American corporate landscape last year, with bankruptcy reaching your highest level from the financial crisis. But the companies supporting PE and VC are particularly difficult to affect, with companies from the portfolio that make up increasing-and record-the share of the bankruptcy of the company, according to S&P data.

Data dating from 2010 include private companies with majority private capital, and also include some public companies with minority strategic investments of private shareholders.

The horror analysis of FTI Consulting aimed at greater private capital requirements does not show a similar increase, but notices an out -of -court tactic that suppresses a bankruptcy number associated with private capital in recent years.

The huge burden of debt became harder to bear due to the increase in the interest rates of the federal reserves, which directly influenced the cost of repayment of the loans with the variable interest rate that raised portfolled companies sponsored by private capital. These high interest rates have now remained elevated for almost three years, and the prospect of relief in the form of aggressive cuts has decreased.

The Convergeon S

Convergeone Manager at IPO NASDAQ 2018 © Nasdaq Inc

S

In the end, it turned out that the debt was too big to submit. Last spring, Convergeone applied for a bankruptcy with only $ 21 million at a bank and $ 1.8 billion in debt. The CVC refused to comment, and Convergeone did not respond to the comment request.

“Consumers are looking for ways to find value when inflation bite,” said Mike Best, a high -yield manager at Barings. “The market is full of bankruptcy in consumer products and retail,” he added.

While most companies supporting private capital is failing due to a combination of too much debt and operational problems, some cases cause sharp accusations. One major case: Instant Brands, which produces popular express potat pot, appeared as one of those fiercely challenged corporate failures.

In 2019, Cornell Capital bought an instant brands for just over $ 600 million. By 2023. The kitchen appliance manufacturer submitted a bankruptcy request. Shortly after the company requested court protection, the creditors accused Cornella of pulling out large amounts of money from the company’s cash register.

The creditors sued Cornell Capital and certain executives in November because of the “robbery of the portfolio company” with the payment of $ 345 million dividends for their investors, which is why instant brands remained non -solvent.

The trial of these charges should start later this year. A spokesman Cornell Capital called the statements “unfounded attacks” in the statement and challenged that the recapitalization of the dividend had led to bankruptcy instant brands, stating “uncontrolled macroeconomic events”.

Meanwhile, out-of-court maneuvers to prevent non-solvency, which are usually called the exercises of liability or LME management, have increased because companies are trying to avoid Chapter 11.

“Private capital sponsors have an increased interest in LMEs,” David Meyer, head of the Restructuring and Reorganization Group of Vinson and Elkins, said in an interview with David Meyer. “The primary focus is: How can we solve the situation outside the court?”

Although popular, the solution rarely lasts. Slightly less than half of respondents in an Alixpartners survey from October he described the exercise of obligations to manage as successful. Only 3 percent said that these were permanent repairs.

Almost all of Joanna’s fabric stores had a positive cash flow, but the high rates doubled the payments of the company’s interest © Amy Lee/Alamy

Despite the efforts to prevent non -solvency, some companies have earned a doubtful title of entry into the “Chapter 22” or “Chapter 33” procedures, which is an expression indicating their second or third consecutive bankruptcy.

One of the latest such cases is Joann, a fabric merchant and a sewing accessories based in Ohi with hundreds of locations, thousands of employees and two separate bankruptcy claims last year.

In 2011, Joann was privatized by Leonard Green and Partners for $ 1.6 billion. The company then performed Joann on the Stock Exchange in 2021, leaving its largest shareholder.

The job flourished in 2020. Thanks to the popularity of checkery and other handicrafts during the pandemic pandemic covid-11. But sales slowed down that the pandemic was fading, more rates were more than doubled the company’s interest repayment, and problems with the supply chain interfere with its inventory – even when 96 percent of its stores had a positive cash flow, according to the documents.

The company filed bankruptcy in March. He appeared a month later after reducing half of his $ 1 billion debt, but finally returned to Chapter 11 earlier this month, this time blames the difficulties of maintaining suppliers delivering products. Joann and Leonard Green did not respond to the comment requests.

“The tide has disappeared and many ships are rocking,” said Jerorold Bregman, a partner in BG Law. Companies of private capital prefer to sell or sell their shares with profit, he added. “Usually, all they want to do is get to the event of liquidity and make some money.”



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button
Social Media Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com